Modernist Bibles & Endtimes Deception

Having diligently compared the KJV to many modernist bibles I have come to the conclusion that the newer versions are being liberally used to sow confusion, and doubt, and outright lies. There are many complex scams being employed to systematically denigrate the word of God as heretical scholars use their influence in the world to woo and seduce the saints into giving credence to their diabolical subterfuges. Here is just one example. Some claim that the last passages in Mark (16:9-20) are not properly part of the Bible. The basis for that claim rests mainly upon two horribly corrupted manuscripts one being called the Sinaiticus, and the other being called the Vaticanus. The Vaticanus does however contain a space where the passages are supposed to go suggesting that the manuscript simply wasn\'t finished. In those days no gap at all was left after the end of a book before starting a new book it being normal practice not to waste any material at all. While the passages are indeed missing the empty space reveals that the passages properly belong there. As regards the second primary manuscript used to propagate this doctrine, the Sinaiticus; under close examination it is revealed that those parts were erased. (To make such conform to the Vaticanus?) The last part of Mark from the Sinaiticus was on display in England and you could plainly see traces of the letters which had been rubbed out. In a modernist bible this deception translates into notations something like this. \"The oldest and best Greek manuscripts do not contain these passages.\" It is a sad day indeed when the children of perdition can get away with such wickedness in that they are actually printing lies on the very pages of what they call bibles.

QUOTE
There is one particular omission that made a real impact upon my mind, that I believe is important to beings into the picture at this point. Several years back I went to the British Museum, specifically to take a look at Sinaiticus. To my surprise I discovered that, while Mark 16:9-20 indeed was missing, it was clear to see that it had originally been there, but had been pumiced (erased) out. The space was still evident in the codex and the letters could faintly be seen. My point is, it was there originally. I could see it with my own eyes! It was at that point that I realized that the note in my New International Version - \"The two most reliable early manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20\", was not telling the whole story! In reality, the verses were originally there! --The Great (?) Uncials

Why Mark 16:9-20 Belongs in the Bible

1 Timothy 6:3-12 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself. But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. And having food and raiment let us be therewith content. But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness. Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses.

Praise the Lord!
bereanwatchmen.com